Which of the following would NOT be considered an abnormal finding in a bimanual exam?

In a bimanual exam, healthcare providers assess various pelvic structures to gather important information about a patient's reproductive health. Normal findings during such an examination provide critical baseline information. A normal uterine size and shape is considered a standard result, indicating that there are no abnormalities present such as enlargement, irregularity, or other structural issues that could suggest conditions like fibroids or congenital anomalies.

In contrast, findings such as cervical motion tenderness, uterine tenderness, and adnexal tenderness may suggest underlying pathology like pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, or other inflammatory or infectious processes. These findings are indicative of potential issues that warrant further investigation or intervention. Thus, recognizing normal findings, like the normal size and shape of the uterus, is essential for distinguishing from signs that may indicate a problem.